Monday, March 12, 2012

Aviators: FAA Accepting Only Electronic Medical Certificates After October 1, 2012

Cessna Mustang
If your FAA medical certificate is coming up for renewal or you are in the process of becoming a pilot, the FAA just announced that as of October 1, 2012,  it will no longer accept paper applications and everyone will be required to complete the application online.

According to the Federal Register public announcement on March 8, 2012, "The Federal Aviation Administration is providing public notice regarding its intent to discontinue use of the paper version of FAA Form 8500-8, the application form used to apply for FAA medical certification. Maintaining FAA Form 8500-8 for applicants to complete manually is burdensome not only in terms of the cost involved, but also in terms of the complex logistics and use of Agency resources involved. This burden becomes all the more compounded when the form must be revised, reprinted, and redistributed (worldwide). The FAA launched an on-line FAA Form 8500-8 application known as ``FAA MedXpress'' beginning in 2007. Since 2007, ``FAA MedXpress'' has evolved considerably, streamlining FAA medical certification into a much more efficient and seamless process, thereby rendering the paper process both redundant and obsolete. Discontinuing print of FAA Form 8500-8 will save considerable resources and improve the efficiency of the airman medical certification process. "


View the complete Federal Register announcement here>>:


http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2012-03-08/html/2012-5655.htm


To complete your medical certificate online via FAA MedXpress click here>>:


https://medxpress.faa.gov/

While we can't give you a medical certificate, we can handle your aircraft registration quickly and easily at one of our FooteWork offices. Come see us! Clear skies!

Wednesday, March 7, 2012

Win a New TomTom GPS! Enter Your Photo With "Why You Love Prescott"!

Why do you LOVE Prescott? WIN a TomTom GPS!
Enter your photo of Prescott and "why you love Prescott" to WIN a NEW TomTom GPS XXL 550M!

Celebrate Arizona's Centennial with FooteWork!
Prescott is where it all began! 

Enter here!>>    https://www.facebook.com/prescottmvd?sk=app_79458893817





Wednesday, February 8, 2012

Arizona Repeals Clean Car Program And Considers Electric Car Tax

Ford Focus Electric
Last month the Governor's Regulatory Review council voted to repeal the year old Clean Car Program that went into effect January 2011 and to instead match the Federal Greenhouse-gas regulations which are less strict.  On the heels of this decision, there is a new Arizona Bill calling for an electric car tax.

According to the Arizona Daily Star "Environmentalists argued that the repeal will discourage zero-emission-vehicle development and harm the state's air quality, but supporters of the change said it will have negligible environmental impact and no economic impact.

"We believe this was the best course of action," said Henry Darwin, director of the Arizona Department of Environmental Quality, which called for the change. "We thought we had a very clear message from the Legislature to not adopt standards more stringent than the federal standard."

Clean Cars went into effect in January 2011 and applies to vehicles sold in Arizona. Mirroring standards in California, the program requires car companies to lower emissions that harm air quality, reduce greenhouse-gas emissions, and sell and develop infrastructure for zero-emissions vehicles.

In 2008, the federal Clean Air Act forced the state to either adopt tailpipe-emissions regulations from the federal government or from California. At the time, according to an ADEQ memo to the council, a strong national program on tailpipe emissions didn't exist.

But in May 2010, the federal Environmental Protection Agency revised its fuel-efficiency and greenhouse-gas standards, prompting the ADEQ's determination that repealing the Clean Car rules in favor of the federal standards would be more beneficial to the state.

With the repeal, the state is dropping its requirement on zero-emissions vehicles. But Arizona didn't have the infrastructure to support zero-emissions vehicles in the first place, the ADEQ argued. "

Source: http://azstarnet.com/business/local/az-repeals-emission-rules-mirroring-calif-standards/article_4c8d395e-4d48-5b49-adc2-14dc6d77bb95.html

Along with the repeal of more stringent emission laws, Arizona is also considering a tax for electric cars.  Green Car Reports says "less than a month after the Arizona Governor’s Regulatory Review Council voted to repeal the state’s Clean Cars law and adopt the less-stringent emissions standards set out in Federal law, the state is now considering charging a pay-per-mile tax on electric car use.

Arizona House Bill 2257 -- introduced by Rep. Steve Farley (D-AZ) -- is modeled on proposed Oregonian legislation and would charge electric car owners up to 1.43 cents per mile travelled.

Like the $100 per year tax being proposed in Washington state and the electric car electricity tax being discussed in Kansas, the proposed Arizona tax would be the electric car equivalent of the tax currently levied on gasoline purchases statewide.

Like the gasoline tax, any funds from the pay-per-mile tax would be spent on maintaining the state’s road network.

“One of the only ways we pay for our roadways is through gas tax, so if they’re not paying into the gas tax system we need to find a way of closing that loophole, and getting them to pay for the roads they use,” Rep. Farley told the Cronkite News. “It’s only fair that we pay for the things we use.”

The majority of electric car owners in Arizona agree, according to Jim Stack, president of the Phoenix chapter of the Electric Auto Association.

“Someday it’s all going to be hybrids and electric vehicles,” he said. “it wouldn’t do us any good if we didn’t have any roads.”

But some consumer groups, whilst acknowledging the need to devise a tax system that ensures electric car owners also pay towards road upkeep, have pointed out that the tax could be too much, too soon.

Given the relatively high sticker price of most electric cars on the market today, they argue, an additional taxation system may put off prospective buyers from making the switch."

Source: http://www.greencarreports.com/news/1072614_arizona-considers-charging-electric-cars-tax-at-1-43-per-mile

Sunday, January 29, 2012

New Federal Law In Effect: Ban on Hand Held Cellphones for Commercial Vehicles

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) - Ban on Hand Held Cellular Phones

Q: What is the effective date of the Mobile Telephone rule?
A: The effective date of the rule is January 3, 2012
Looking for a MVD form?
Go here:
http://www.footework.com/mv_forms.html  

Q: Are wired or wireless earpieces allowed?
A: Yes. Hands-free use of a mobile telephone is allowed using either a wired or wireless earpiece, or the speakerphone function of the mobile telephone. Wireless connection of the mobile telephone to the vehicle for hands-free operation of the telephone, which would allow the use of single-button controls on the steering wheel or dashboard, would also be allowed.

Q: Are commercial motor vehicle (CMV) drivers allowed to use push-to-talk mobile communications equipment while driving?
A: Yes, provided the driver does not reach for, dial, or hold the actual mobile telephone in his/her hand while driving and the driver is able to touch the button needed to operate the push-to-talk feature from the normal seated position with the safety belt fastened. Generally, the use of this type of communications equipment does not require drivers to take their eyes off of the forward roadway because the button used to enable the driver to communicate can be operated from the normal seated position with the safety belt fastened. For example, if the mobile phone is mounted in a cradle or similar device near the driver, or there is a remote push-to-talk button near the vehicle controls to allow the driver to communicate without reaching for, dialing, or holding the actual mobile telephone in his/her hands while driving, the equipment may be used.

Q: Are holders of a commercial driver’s license (CDL) subject to the regulation only when driving a CMV, as defined in 49 CFR 383.5, or any vehicle?
A: CDL holders are subject to the Federal rule only when driving a CMV. 

Q: What drivers are covered by the Federal rule: intrastate or interstate? CDL holders? All CMVs?
A: This Federal rule covers both, drivers of CMVs in interstate commerce, and also any drivers who operate a vehicle transporting a quantity of hazardous materials requiring placarding under 49 CFR Part 172 or any quantity of a material listed as a select agent or toxin in 42 CFR part 73.

If a CMV driver is employed by a State or a political subdivision of a State (e.g. county, city, township, etc.), FMCSA safety regulations do not apply, even if the driver is engaged in interstate transportation. But if a CMV driver employed by a State or a political subdivision of a State is operating a vehicle that requires a CDL, the applicable State traffic laws would govern (e.g., Maryland’s prohibition on the use of hand-held phones). The States have 3 years to implement by State law the disqualification provision.

Q: What is required of the employer in terms of company policy or training?
A: The rule does not require motor carriers to establish written policies in terms of company policy or training programs for their drivers. However, employers are prohibited from allowing or requiring their drivers to use hand-held mobile phones. A motor carrier may establish policies or practices that make it clear that the employer does not require or allow hand-held mobile telephone use while driving a CMV in interstate commerce. The carrier is responsible for its drivers’ conduct.

Q: Is dialing a phone number allowed under this rule?
A: No. Dialing a mobile telephone while operating a CMV in interstate commerce is prohibited by the rule. A driver can initiate, answer, or terminate a call by touching a single button on a mobile telephone, earpiece, steering wheel, or instrument panel – comparable to using vehicle controls or instrument panel functions, such as the radio or climate control system.

Q: Can a driver reach for a mobile telephone even if he/she intends to use the hands-free function?
A: No. In order to comply with this rule, a driver must have his or her mobile telephone located where the driver is able to initiate, answer, or terminate a call by touching a single button while the driver is in the seated driving position and properly restrained by a seat belt. If the mobile telephone is not close to the driver and operable while the driver is restrained by properly installed and adjusted seat belts, then the driver is considered to be reaching for the mobile phone, which is prohibited by the rule.

Q: Are tow trucks exempt?
A: No. The interstate operation of tow trucks that meet the definition of a CMV are not exempt. Tow trucks, however, are exempt when responding to police emergencies in accordance with 49 CFR 390.23(a)(3).

Source: http://www.fmcsa.dot.gov/about/other/faq/cellphone-ban-faqs.aspx
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

U.S. Transportation Secretary LaHood Announces Final Rule That Bans Hand-Held Cell Phone Use by Drivers of Buses and Large Trucks  |  Today’s Action is the Latest by the Department to End Distracted Driving

WASHINGTON - U.S. Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood today announced a final rule specifically prohibiting interstate truck and bus drivers from using hand-held cell phones while operating their vehicles. The joint rule from the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) and the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA) is the latest action by the U.S. Department of Transportation to end distracted driving.

"When drivers of large trucks, buses and hazardous materials take their eyes off the road for even a few seconds, the outcome can be deadly," said Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood. "I hope that this rule will save lives by helping commercial drivers stay laser-focused on safety at all times while behind the wheel."

The final rule prohibits commercial drivers from using a hand-held mobile telephone while operating a commercial truck or bus. Drivers who violate the restriction will face federal civil penalties of up to $2,750 for each offense and disqualification from operating a commercial motor vehicle for multiple offenses. Additionally, states will suspend a driver's commercial driver's license (CDL) after two or more serious traffic violations. Commercial truck and bus companies that allow their drivers to use hand-held cell phones while driving will face a maximum penalty of $11,000. Approximately four million commercial drivers would be affected by this final rule.

"This final rule represents a giant leap for safety," said FMCSA Administrator Anne S. Ferro. "It's just too dangerous for drivers to use a hand-held cell phone while operating a commercial vehicle. Drivers must keep their eyes on the road, hands on the wheel and head in the game when operating on our roads. Lives are at stake."

While driver distraction studies have produced mixed results, FMCSA research shows that using a hand-held cell phone while driving requires a commercial driver to take several risky steps beyond what is required for using a hands-free mobile phone, including searching and reaching for the phone. Commercial drivers reaching for an object, such as a cell phone, are three times more likely to be involved in a crash or other safety-critical event. Dialing a hand-held cell phone makes it six times more likely that commercial drivers will be involved in a crash or other safety-critical event.

In September 2010, FMCSA issued a regulation banning text messaging while operating a commercial truck or bus and PHMSA followed with a companion regulation in February 2011, banning texting by intrastate hazardous materials drivers.

"Needless injuries and deaths happen when people are distracted behind the wheel," said PHMSA Administrator Cynthia Quarterman. "Our final rule would improve safety and reduce risks of hazmat in transportation."

Nearly 5474 people died and half a million were injured in crashes involving a distracted driver in 2009. Distraction-related fatalities represented 16 percent of overall traffic fatalities in 2009, according to National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) research.

Many of the largest truck and bus companies, such as UPS, Covenant Transport, Wal-Mart, Peter Pan and Greyhound already have company policies in place banning their drivers from using hand-held phones.

Source: http://www.fmcsa.dot.gov/about/news/news-releases/2011/Secretary-LaHood-Announces-Step-towards-Safer-Highways.aspx

Wednesday, January 18, 2012

Important Aircraft Registration and Re-Registration Facts for Arizona Aircraft Owners

Did you know that a third of all aircraft are inaccurately registered?  Because of these inaccuracies, there is a new process in place that really affects aircraft registered before October 1, 2010.  According to the FAA, "About one-third of today's 357,000 registered aircraft have inaccurate records. At least 100,000 of these are not expected to re-register. Prompt reporting of a change in aircraft ownership, mailing address, or destruction has long been required by registration regulations. Without these reports from the owners the aircraft records could not be updated. The Registry has revoked registrations due to unreported changes; however, this process is slow and expensive. In many cases registration would be revoked, but owners whose notices were undeliverable would be unaware and continue to operate their now unregistered aircraft."-source: http://www.faa.gov/licenses_certificates/aircraft_certification/aircraft_registry/reregistration/


"These improvements will give us better knowledge about the state of the aviation industry, especially general aviation," said FAA Administrator Randy Babbitt. "We also are responding to calls from law enforcement and other government agencies for more accurate, up-to-date registration data."

Basically, aircraft registered before October 1, 2010 have a specific re-registration dates over a three year period that takes place from October 1, 2010 to December 31, 2013 to renew and update their information.  Six months before your expiration, the Registry (Aircraft Registration Branch) will mail information to the owner that identifies the re-registration expiration date and the three month window to which comply before expiration.  It is important that they have the correct address and most likely many will need to be proactive to find out this relevant information.  All aircraft registered on or after October 1, 2010 have three years before their expiration date which is shown on their current paperwork.


Aircraft Re-Registration Schedule
If the Certificate was issued in:The certificate expires on:The owner must apply for re-registration between these dates, - to allow delivery of a new certificate before expiration.
Marchof any yearMarch 31, 2011November 1, 2010and January 31, 2011
April of any yearJune 30, 2011February 1, 2011and April 30, 2011
May of any yearSeptember 30, 2011May 1, 2011and July 31, 2011
June of any yearDecember 31, 2011August 1, 2011and October 31, 2011
July of any yearMarch 31, 2012November 1, 2011and January 31, 2012
August of any yearJune 30, 2012February 1, 2012and April 30, 2012
September of any yearSeptember 30, 2012May 1, 2012and July 31, 2012
October of any yearDecember 31, 2012August 1, 2012and October 31, 2012
November of any yearMarch 31, 2013November 1, 2012and January 31, 2013
December of any yearJune 30, 2013February 1, 2013and April 30, 2013
January of any yearSeptember 30, 2013May 1, 2013and July 31, 2013
February of any yearDecember 31, 2013August 1, 2013and October 31, 2013

To check the accuracy of your aircraft's registration go to: http://registry.faa.gov/aircraftinquiry/nnum_inquiry.aspx.  

CONTACT FOOTEWORK, WE ARE AIRCRAFT OWNERS TOO!
Bottom line, the process may be a bit confusing.  For all Arizona Aircraft Owners who have questions or need assistance, feel free to call FooteWork.  Our staff is poised to assist you with ADOT and FAA issues.  Clear Skies!






Tuesday, January 10, 2012

Towing something? Do you know you know your GCWR, or, Gross Combination Weight Rating?

GCWR, or, Gross Combination Weight Rating is something every weekender or commercial operator towing something should know, but few do and this is something we get asked a lot at FooteWork after our customers have purchased a vehicle or RV and completed their necessary title and registration work with us.

Understanding how much you can tow or GCWR (Gross Combined Weight Rating) is more than just combining your truck, car, or SUV's maximum towing weight with the vehicle being towed.  "According to Ford Motor Company, the GCWR is calculated by adding the following weights together: The vehicle's listed curb weight, allowable payload, driver and passenger weight and trailer weight 
[source: Ford Motor Company]." 
-source: http://auto.howstuffworks.com/auto-parts/towing/towing-capacity/vehicle/gcwr.htm 


"The primary reason for setting a GCWR for any vehicle is safety. Overloading a tow vehicle or a trailer is dangerous enough. Overload both and you've really got a problem. Not only is a heavy load difficult to control on the road, but several other components could also be at risk. For example, the braking systems may overheat and fail, reducing or even eliminating the possibility of safely slowing or stopping your vehicle. The tires may not be able to handle the extra load, potentially causing a blow out situation. The engine and transmission in the tow vehicle may overheat due to the added strain, causing a mechanical failure. Components within the tow vehicle or trailer's suspension system could bend or even break, causing you to lose control on the road. The truth is that a variety of problems could result from overloading. Again, you should never surpass your vehicle's GCWR."
-source: http://auto.howstuffworks.com/auto-parts/towing/towing-capacity/vehicle/gcwr.htm 


How do you know what your GCWR of your vehicle?  Typically, it is found inside of the door frame of the driver's door.  Most vehicle manufacturers also publish this information on the web.  It is also most likely found within the vehicle manual that you may have received if you purchased the vehicle new.


RELATED LINKS:


Info on GCWR:
http://auto.howstuffworks.com/auto-parts/towing/towing-capacity/vehicle/gcwr.htm 

Glossary of terms on GCWR:

Tuesday, January 3, 2012

Start the Year Right! Get Involved! Yavapai Big Brothers Big Sisters

www.azbigs.org

"Everyone has a transferable commodity-knowledge. Sharing your unique expertise and making introductions for someone creates a lasting legacy." 
~Marsha Blackburn.

Big Brothers, Big Sisters and Family Matches Needed.

Call 9287785135 or visit www.azbigs.org to learn more.